It seems these days just about everyone has a way of broadcasting their opinions through some sort of media. Which is too bad.

Thanks to the digital revolution, just about every yahoo with the capacity to translate spoken word into literate symbols has the potential to be published, posted or printed. All it seems to take is the motivation (or nerve) and the keen ability to manipulate a keyboard.

Technology has now made voicing your opinion to the entire world easier than restocking your toilet paper and has become just as arbitrary. Ever been to an Internet forum per se?

So if motivation is the only real factor here, what kind of people are so inclined? Extremist more than moderates, fundamentalist more than pragmatics, the obsessed more than the balanced. The discontent over the swinging pendulum between our modern polarized politics only gets wilder and farther flung when these groups play a larger part.

The term becoming more used I believe is “the base.” The religious base, the minority base ... et cetera, et cetera. These are the people so far to one side of the values equation they have become down right inflexible, and thus politically reliable to the party they support. Everyone has a place and a right to be what they wish, but their ignorance and unwillingness to compromise has somehow been mutated into being seen as a positive trait. Its endorsement and exploitation are dangerous affairs for a free society.

I’m something of a moderate, or so I’d like to think. I’ve been called liberal a few times and called a totalitarian a few others. I think the source of such remarks are often as relevant as the people being targeted by them. The far wing followers tend to throw the most mud, like Ann Coulter and Al Sharpton for example. BS is often flung by those already covered in it.

The louder the fringe becomes, the quieter those in between fall. I always hated labels like liberal, conservative, republican, democrat ... as if a single word had the power to translate the substance of a person’s beliefs. These words are nothing more than creations of political simplicity.

If I meet a person and told them I am a liberal, they’ve probably already passed a dozen judgments on a variety of things I hadn’t even a chance to say on my own. Once judgments are passed, communications break down and the goal of such political tactics have achieved their purpose.

No one really falls into these categories. How many people completely agree with the goals of the party they are aligned? How many anointed liberal or conservatives entirely agree with everything to the right or left of them? How many people actually know what belong to, how many care?

I am a registered Democrat, but here’s the thing ... I don’t completely agree with anything. I want my guns for example, welfare is run amok, affirmative action is reverse racism and illegal immigrants are, at least technically, criminals.

I think capital punishment is wrong in a country that doesn’t even allow merciful suicide. I think capitalism should take a back seat to government and most corporations need the kind of backside-kicking that trust buster FDR handed out at the turn of the depression.

I want to be able to have a cigarette in a bar. I think marijuana should either be legal or we ought to bring back prohibition. I want the right to burn my flag. The flag represents my right to choose and since when did the object representing those beliefs become more important than the beliefs themselves? Why don’t people see the ironic hypocrisy?